Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.
A direct comparison of the recommendations presented in the above guidelines for the assessment and management of obesity and overweight in adults is provided below.
The NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD guidelines are in general agreement that measurement of BMI, defined as weight in kilograms/height in meters2 (kg/m2), is the most reliable and valid method for gauging overweight and obesity in adults. BMI is also well correlated with degree of risk for obesity-related complications, such as cardiovascular disease. Both NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD refer to the same scheme for classification of overweight and obesity: a BMI of 25.0 to 29.9 is classified as overweight; obesity is categorized as Class I (BMI 30 to 34.9), Class II (BMI 35 to 39.9), and Class III (BMI >40). NCCPC/NICE cautions that BMI needs to be interpreted with caution in certain groups, including highly muscular adults, Asians, and older people. The importance of waist circumference as an indicator of cardiovascular and other disease risk is also emphasized by NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD. The groups agree that a waist circumference of >88 cm (35 inches) in women and >102 cm (40 inches) in men is very high and indicates increased risk, independent of BMI.
The two guidelines that provide recommendations on assessment, NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD, recommend a clinical assessment be performed, which should include a basic medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests as indicated. The clinical assessment should screen for comorbid conditions, particularly obesity-related health risks. Other factors to be evaluated include the patient's history of obesity, previous weight-loss attempts, and lifestyle factors, such as dietary and exercise habits.
Both groups also recommend patients undergo a social and psychological assessment to identify behavioral health conditions, such as depression and binge eating, which may affect the success of therapy. There is also agreement that patient motivation to lose weight should be evaluated before initiating therapy.
The groups that provide specific recommendations, NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD, agree that weight loss programs should be multifaceted and combine dietary interventions, physical activity, and behavioral modification strategies. Both groups emphasize that interventions should be selected according to the patient's risk level (based on BMI and waist circumference), the potential to gain health benefits, and patient preferences. NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD agree that the patient and the clinical team together should reach conclusions on the goals of therapy and preferred treatment plan, and that the treatment plan should be documented in the medical record. Recommendations regarding weight loss goals are similar, with NCCPC/NICE recommending a 5 to 10% loss of original weight, and VA/DoD noting that a 10% weight loss is a reasonable initial goal. The groups agree that the patient's partner/spouse and family should participate in and support any weight loss program. There is also agreement that the patient and their families and/or carers should be educated on a number of relevant topics, including the nature of overweight and obesity, treatment options, prognosis, length and frequency of therapy, and the distinction between losing weight and maintaining weight loss.
The two groups that provide specific recommendations, NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD, recommend that any dietary regimen intended to promote weight loss create a caloric deficit of 600 kcal/day and 500-1000 kcal/day, respectively. NCCPC/NICE also cites low-fat diets as an appropriate dietary regimen for sustainable weight loss, noting that either option should be used in combination with expert support and intensive follow-up.
LCDs (1000-1200 kcal/day for women; 1,200 to 1,600 kcal/day for men) are cited by both groups as a dietary option, with NCCPC/NICE noting that they are less likely to be nutritionally complete and VA/DoD similarly stating that they should include the major nutrients in appropriate proportions. VA/DoD also states that low-fat intake (20 to 30 percent of total calories/day), as part of LCDs, can be recommended to induce weight loss and should be recommended for patients with cardiovascular disease or lipid abnormalities.
Both groups also address VLCDs, which NCCPC/NICE classifies as less than 1000 kcal/day. VA/DoD acknowledges a lack of standardization of commonly used terms, such as VLCDs, and notes that it is the beyond the scope of its guideline to determine standardized macronutrient measures and calories to be applied as definitions for each diet. In terms of the groups' recommendations, NCCPC/NICE states that VLCDs may be used for a maximum of 12 weeks continuously, or intermittently with a LCD, by people who are obese and have reached a plateau in weight loss. VA/DoD recommends against VLCDs that restrict calories to less than 800 kcal/day for weight loss, but notes that they may be used short term (12 to 16 weeks) under medical supervision.
There is overall agreement that physical activity should be one of the primary components of any weight loss program. The groups that provide specific recommendations, NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD, agree that physical activity be recommended not only to promote weight loss but also for the other health benefits it can bring, such as improved cardiovascular outcomes. Both groups recommend that moderate levels of physical activity should be performed a minimum of 30 minutes most days of the week, and that the activity can be in one session or several lasting 10 minutes or more. NCCPC/NICE also notes that people who have been obese and have lost weight should be advised they may need to do 60-90 minutes of activity a day to avoid regaining weight. Both groups agree that both structured, supervised exercise programs as well as home fitness activities that can be incorporated into everyday life are effective physical activity interventions.
There is overall agreement that pharmacologic therapy should only be considered for patients who have not achieved their weight loss goals through dietary, activity and behavioral changes. All of the groups agree that the use of pharmacotherapy should generally be reserved for obese patients (BMI >30 kg/m2). NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD further agree that pharmacotherapy can also be considered for adults with a lower BMI who also have obesity-related comorbidities (VA/DoD recommends BMI >27 kg/m2; NCCPC/NICE specifies 28.0 kg/m2 for orlistat and 27 kg/m2 for sibutramine). All groups emphasize that drug therapy should be used only in combination with a reduced-calorie diet, increased exercise, and behavioral interventions.
There is overall agreement that patients should be regularly evaluated to monitor the effect of drug treatment and adherence to lifestyle and behavioral interventions. Recommendations from NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD regarding duration of treatment are similar, with NCCPC/NICE recommending a 3-month follow-up. They state that therapy with orlistat or sibutramine should be continued beyond 3 months only if the person has lost at least 5% of their initial body weight since starting drug treatment. VA/DoD makes the same recommendation for orlistat, but recommends a 1-month follow-up for sibutramine, noting that patients who have lost an average of 1 pound or more per week during the first 4 weeks of therapy with sibutramine should continue treatment, barring any intolerable side effects. Alternately, VA/DoD continues, patients who fail to lose 4 pounds after 4 weeks treated with sibutramine should have their adherence assessed and, if appropriate, an increase in the dose for an additional 4-week trial. Refer to Areas of Difference for more information.
Both NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD note the potential adverse effect on blood pressure and heart that sibutramine can cause, and recommend it be prescribed with caution and the patient is closely monitored for these effects.
There is overall agreement that clinicians should discuss with patients who are candidates for bariatric surgery (and their families as appropriate) the benefits and potential risks of bariatric procedures. The groups further agree that bariatric surgery should be reserved for patients with extreme obesity (generally BMI >40) who have failed to control weight by other means and who remain at high risk of medical comorbidities. NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD agree that surgery can also be considered for adults with a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or more with one or more obesity-associated chronic health conditions. NCCPC/NICE also recommends bariatric surgery as a first-line option (instead of lifestyle interventions or drug treatment) for adults with a BMI of more than 50 kg/m2 in whom surgical intervention is considered appropriate.
ACP recommends that patients be referred to high-volume centers with surgeons experienced in the surgical procedures. With regard to selecting a specific procedure, VA/DoD specifies that RYGB is the bariatric procedure with the most robust evidence for inducing sustained weight loss for patients with BMI greater than 40 kg/m2. NCCPC/NICE recommends that the choice of surgical intervention be made jointly by the patient and clinician, taking into account the degree of obesity, comorbidities, evidence on effectiveness and long-term effects, facilities and equipment available, and the surgeon's experience. There is overall agreement that lifelong medical follow-up after surgery is necessary to monitor adherence to treatment, adverse effects and complications, dietary restrictions, and behavioral health.
Guidance regarding specific medications recommended for pharmacotherapy differ somewhat. ACP cites sibutramine, orlistat, phentermine, diethylpropion, fluoxetine, and bupropion as options, adding that there are no data to determine whether one drug is more efficacious than another. NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD, in contrast, assert that the drugs with the widest efficacy and safety data are orlistat and sibutramine. With regard to other medications recommended by ACP, phentermine and diethylpropion are acknowledged to have short-term efficacy by VA/DoD. Neither NCCPC/NICE nor VA/DoD address bupropion.
With regard to duration of treatment, ACP asserts that there are no long-term (>12 months) studies of efficacy or safety to inform the decision to continue treatment beyond 1 year and that the decision to continue should be a shared discussion between the physician and patient. VA/DoD, however, states that sibutramine and orlistat may be considered as a component of weight maintenance programs for up to 2 years and 4 years, respectively. According to NCCPC/NICE, treatment with sibutramine is not currently recommended beyond the licensed duration of 12 months. With regard to orlistat, NCCPC/NICE states that the decision to use orlistat for longer than 12 months (usually for weight maintenance) should be made after discussing potential benefits and limitations with the patient.
| COMPARISON OF RECOMMENDATIONS | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EVALUATION/DIAGNOSIS
|
|||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
No recommendations offered. |
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Identification and Classification of Overweight and Obesity Healthcare professionals should use their clinical judgement to decide when to measure a person's height and weight. Opportunities include registration with a general practice, consultation for related conditions (such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease) and other routine health checks. Measures of Overweight or Obesity Adults
Adults and Children
Classification of Overweight or Obesity Adults
|
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Obtain Height and Weight; Calculate BMI Recommendations Adult patients should have their BMI calculated from their height and weight to establish a diagnosis of overweight or obesity. [B] Obese patients (BMI >30 kg/m2) should be offered weight loss treatment. [B] Overweight patients (BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m2) or patients with increased waist circumference (>40 inches for men; >35 inches for women) should be assessed for the presence of obesity-associated conditions that are directly influenced by weight, to determine the benefit they might receive from weight loss treatment. [B] Obtain Waist Circumference Measurement Recommendations For screening purposes, waist circumference should be obtained in patients with a BMI <30 kg/m2 as a predictor of disease risk. [C] The waist circumference measurement should be made with a tape measure placed above the iliac crest and wrapped in a horizontal fashion around the individual's abdomen at the end of a normal expiration. Gender-specific cut-offs should be used as indicators of increased waist circumference. [C]
|
||||||||||||
|
TREATMENT/MANAGEMENT
|
|||||||||||||
| Assessment | |||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
No recommendations offered. |
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Assessment This section should be read in conjunction with the NICE guideline on eating disorders (NICE clinical guideline no. 9; available from www.nice.org.uk/CG009), particularly if a person who is not overweight asks for advice on losing weight. Adults and Children
Adults
|
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Obtain Medical History, Physical Examination, and Laboratory Tests as Indicated The clinical assessment of the overweight or obese patient should be done by the primary care provider. The assessment should include a basic medical history, a relevant physical examination, and laboratory tests as clinically indicated. The history should include age of onset or periods of rapid increase in body weight, precipitating factors, and maximum lifetime weight. [Expert Opinion] The clinical assessment should rule out organic and drug related causes and identify health risks and/or the presence of weight-related conditions. [Expert Opinion] In addition to a medical assessment, a social and psychological assessment may be indicated to identify barriers to participating in dietary or physical activity programs. The assessment may also include screening for behavioral health conditions that may hinder successful weight loss (i.e., depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, bipolar disorder, addictions, binge eating disorder, bulimia, and alcoholism). [Expert Opinion] A nutritional evaluation should include an assessment of current intake as well as the use of supplements, herbs, and over-the-counter weight loss aides. In addition, meal and snack patterns and problem eating behaviors need to be assessed. The weight and dieting history should include the age of onset of weight gain, number and types of diets and attempts, possible triggers of weight gains and losses, and range of weight change. [Expert Opinion] Current levels of physical activity and sedentary lifestyle should be assessed, including exercise frequency, duration, and intensity as well as the patient's motivation to increase physical activity. [Expert Opinion] Assess Patient's Readiness to Lose Weight Readiness to lose weight should be assessed by direct inquiry. Those indicating an adequate readiness to lose weight (preparation or action stage) should proceed to treatment. Those not yet ready to lose weight (precontemplation or contemplation stage) should receive motivational counseling. [Expert Opinion] |
||||||||||||
| Treatment Strategy | |||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
No recommendations offered. |
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Generic Principles of Care Adults and Children
Adults
Lifestyle Interventions The recommendations in this section deal with lifestyle changes for people actively trying to lose weight; recommendations about lifestyle changes and self-management strategies for people wishing to maintain a healthy weight can be found in section 1.1.1 of the full version of the original guideline document. General Adults and Children
Adults
|
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Reach Shared Decisions About Goals and Treatment Plan The clinical team, together with the patient, should reach shared decisions regarding the treatment program. [Expert Opinion]
The patient's family/caregiver may participate in the treatment process and should be involved in assisting the patient with changing lifestyle, diet and physical activity patterns. [Expert Opinion] A detailed treatment plan needs to be documented in the medical record to provide integrated care. [Expert Opinion] Initiate Interventions Based on Risk Level and Patient Preferences Weight loss therapy should be tailored to risk level based on calculated BMI and based upon the balance of benefits and risks and patient preferences. [C] Patients who may benefit from weight loss should be offered interventions to improve their diet, increase exercise, and change related behaviors to promote weight loss. [A] Weight loss interventions should combine dietary therapy, increased physical activity, and behavioral modification strategies rather than utilizing one intervention alone. [A] A reasonable initial goal of weight loss therapy (intervention) is a 10 percent reduction in body weight. [B] Drug therapy in combination with a reduced-calorie diet and exercise interventions should be considered for obese patients (BMI >30 kg/m2) or overweight patients (BMI >27 kg/m2) with an obesity-associated chronic health condition (i.e., hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and sleep apnea). [B] Bariatric surgery to reduce body weight, improve obesity-associated comorbidities, and improve quality of life may be considered in adult patients with a BMI >40 kg/m2 and those with a BMI >35 kg/m2 with at least one obesity-associated chronic health condition (i.e., hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and sleep apnea). [B] There is insufficient evidence to recommend drug or surgical interventions specifically for patients who have documented CAD. [I] However, there is good evidence that drug and surgical weight loss interventions may improve cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. [A] There is insufficient evidence to recommend drug or surgical interventions specifically for patients who have DJD. However, physical activity and diet may improve physical function and chronic pain in patients with DJD. [I] |
||||||||||||
| Dietary Interventions | |||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
Clinicians should counsel all obese patients (defined as those with a body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) on lifestyle and behavioral modifications such as appropriate diet and exercise, and the patient's goals for weight loss should be individually determined (these goals may encompass not only weight loss but also other parameters, such as decreasing blood pressure or fasting blood glucose levels). |
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Dietary Advice Adults and Children
Adults
|
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Diet Therapy Recommendations Weight Loss Dietary interventions should be individually planned, in conjunction with physical activity, to create a caloric deficit of 500 to 1,000 kcal/day. Such negative energy balance may lead to a weight loss of 1 to 2 pounds per week. [B] Selection of Specific Diets Dietary programs should at a minimum reduce the usual caloric intake by 500 to 1,000 kcal/day to achieve modest weight loss. [B] LCDs should generally include 1,000 to 1,200 kcal/day for women and 1,200 to 1,600 kcal/day for men and should include the major nutrients in appropriate proportions (see Appendix C, Table C-1 in the original guideline document). [B] VLCDs that restrict calories to less than 800 kcal/day [15 kcal/kg ideal body weight] are not recommended for weight loss, but may be used short term (12 to 16 weeks) under medical supervision. [B] Low-fat intake (20 to 30 percent of total calories/day), as part of LCDs, can be recommended to induce weight loss and should be recommended for patients with cardiovascular disease or lipid abnormalities. [B] Low-carbohydrate diets (less than 20 percent of total calories) may be used for short-term weight loss, but are not recommended for long-term dieting or weight maintenance. [B] Low-carbohydrate diets can be recommended to reduce serum triglyceride levels for overweight patients with mixed dyslipidemia. [B] Low-carbohydrate diets are not recommended for patients with hepatic or renal disease or for patients with diabetes who are unable to monitor blood glucose. [C] LCDs or VLCDs may include meal replacements (e.g., bars and shakes). [A] There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against a diet limited to foods with a glycemic index less than 55 as a means of producing weight loss. [C] Commercial Diets Patients should be encouraged to adhere to a specific diet, as adherence to any diet plan from a variety of programs (e.g., Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone) has been shown to be the most important factor in achieving weight reduction. [B] |
||||||||||||
| Physical Activity | |||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
Clinicians should counsel all obese patients (defined as those with a body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) on lifestyle and behavioral modifications such as appropriate diet and exercise, and the patient's goals for weight loss should be individually determined (these goals may encompass not only weight loss but also other parameters, such as decreasing blood pressure or fasting blood glucose levels). |
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Physical Activity Adults
|
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Physical Activity Recommendations Weight loss interventions should include exercise to promote weight loss [A], maintain weight loss [A], decrease abdominal obesity [B], improve cardiovascular fitness [A], improve cardiovascular outcomes [A], and decrease all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [B]. Home fitness/lifestyle activities or structured supervised programs may be effectively used to produce a caloric expenditure leading to weight loss. [A] Moderate levels of physical activity should be performed at least 30 minutes most days of the week. [B] Physical activity may include short intermittent bursts (10 minutes or longer) as well as longer continuous exercise. [A] |
||||||||||||
| Behavior Modification | |||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
No recommendations offered. |
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Behavioural Interventions Adults and Children
Adults
|
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Behavioral Modification Strategies Recommendations Behavioral modification interventions to improve adherence to diet and physical activity should be given to overweight or obese individuals. [B] Behavioral modification interventions should be provided at a higher intensity when possible for greater effectiveness. Higher intensity is defined as more than one personal contact per month for the first three months (individual or group setting). Less frequent intervention may be an ineffective and inefficient use of manpower. [B] Multiple behavioral modification strategies should be used in combination for greater effectiveness. [A] Behavioral modification intervention should be delivered in a group format when possible rather than individually. [B] For individuals unable or unwilling to participate in weight loss treatment in person, telephone or internet-based behavioral modification intervention may be considered. [B] Behavioral modification intervention should be continued on a long-term basis to promote maintenance of weight loss. [B] |
||||||||||||
| Pharmacotherapy | |||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
There are no data to determine whether one drug is more efficacious than another, and there is no evidence for increased weight loss with combination therapy. There are no data about weight regain after medications are withdrawn, underscoring the need for sustained lifestyle and behavioral modifications. There are no long-term (>12 months) studies of efficacy or safety to inform the decision to continue treatment beyond 1 year; thus, the decision to continue should be a shared discussion between the physician and patient. |
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Pharmacological Interventions This section contains recommendations that update the NICE technology appraisals on orlistat and sibutramine (NICE technology appraisal guidance no. 22 and NICE technology appraisal guidance no. 31); see section 6 of the full length original guideline document for details. General: Indications and Initiation Adults and Children
Adults
Continued Prescribing and Withdrawal Adults and Children
Adults
Orlistat Adults
Sibutramine Adults
|
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Pharmacotherapy Recommendations Adult patients with a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 or a BMI greater than 27 kg/m2 with obesity-associated conditions may be considered for pharmacotherapy in combination with a reduced-calorie diet, increased physical activity and behavioral therapy. [B] Patients who do not respond to medication with a reasonable weight loss should be evaluated for adherence to the medication regimen and adjunctive therapies or considered for an adjustment of dosage. [I] If the patient continues to be unresponsive to the medication, or serious adverse effects occur, the use of medication should be discontinued. [I] Orlistat Orlistat may be considered to reduce body weight [B] and improve obesity-associated cardiovascular risk factors. [C] Patients who have lost 5 percent or more of their body weight after 12 weeks of treatment or lost an average of 1 pound or more per week with orlistat should continue their current treatment, as they are more likely to experience sustained weight loss. [B] Orlistat may be considered as a component of weight maintenance programs for up to 4 years. [B] Patients prescribed orlistat should take a multiple vitamin that includes fat soluble vitamins. [Expert Opinion] Sibutramine Sibutramine may be considered to reduce body weight [B] and improve glycemic and lipid parameters. [C] Patients who have lost an average of 1 pound or more per week during the first 4 weeks of therapy with sibutramine should continue treatment, barring any intolerable side effects. [Expert Opinion] Patients who fail to lose 4 pounds after 4 weeks treated with sibutramine should have their adherence assessed and, if appropriate, an increase in the dose for an additional 4-week trial. [I] Sibutramine may be considered as a component of weight maintenance programs for up to 2 years. [B] Sibutramine should be discontinued if it is not efficacious in helping the patient to lose or maintain weight loss. [B] Sibutramine should be used with caution as it can elevate blood pressure and heart rate. [A] Adult patients with uncontrolled hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke should not include sibutramine as a part of their weight loss program due to the increased risk of harm. [D] Sibutramine should be avoided in patients taking SSRIs, MAOIs, triptans, pseudoephedrine, and other agents that affect serotonin. [D] |
||||||||||||
| Bariatric Surgery | |||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
|
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Surgical Interventions This section updates the NICE technology appraisal on surgery for people with morbid obesity (NICE technology appraisal guidance no. 46); see section 6 of the full length original guideline document for details. Adults and Children
See recommendations below for additional criteria to use when assessing children and adults.
Adults
|
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Bariatric Surgery Recommendations Adult patients with extreme obesity (BMI 40 kg/m2 or more) or severe obesity (BMI 35 kg/m2 or more with one or more obesity-associated chronic health condition) may be considered for bariatric surgery to reduce body weight [A], improve obesity-associated comorbidities [B], and improve quality of life [B]. RYGB is recommended as the bariatric procedure with the most robust evidence for inducing sustained weight loss [B] for patients with BMI greater than 40 kg/m2. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the routine use of bariatric surgery in those over 65 years of age and patients with a substantial surgical risk. [I] Providers should engage all patients who are candidates for bariatric surgery in a detailed discussion of the benefits and potential risks of bariatric procedures. [I] Relative contraindications to bariatric surgery that are supported only by expert consensus include:
Lifelong medical follow-up after surgery is necessary to monitor adherence to treatment, adverse effects and complications, dietary restrictions, and behavioral health. [I] |
||||||||||||
| Follow-Up/Maintenance of Weight Loss | |||||||||||||
| ACP (2005) |
No recommendations offered. |
||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Generic Principles of Care Adults and Children
Note: Refer to the individual sections of this Synthesis for follow-up recommendations pertaining to individual interventions. |
||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Weight Maintenance and Follow-Up Is Patient Losing Weight? Patients on diet, exercise, and behavioral therapy who have lost on average 1 to 2 pounds per week should continue with their current treatment until their weight loss goal is achieved. [B] Patients who have lost on average less than 1 pound per week should have their adherence to therapy assessed and treatment plan reevaluated. [I] Obese patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2, and overweight patients with a BMI >27 kg/m2 and obesity-associated chronic health conditions who fail to achieve adequate weight loss through non-pharmacologic interventions may be candidates for pharmacotherapy with orlistat or sibutramine. [B] Congratulate and Initiate Relapse Prevention/Maintenance Patients who have met their weight loss goals or have stopped losing weight and are ready to sustain current weight loss should be offered a maintenance program consisting of diet, physical activity, and behavioral support. Weight status should be reevaluated and diet and physical activity should be adjusted so that energy balance is maintained (energy intake is equal to energy expenditure). [B] Providers should continue to maintain contact with patients providing on-going support, encouragement, and close monitoring during the maintenance phase of weight loss to prevent weight regain. [B] Patients who achieve their weight loss goal with a combination of medication, diet, and exercise may be considered candidates to include their medication as a component of their weight maintenance program with continued monitoring of effectiveness and adverse effects. [B] Lifelong follow-up after bariatric surgery is necessary to monitor adherence to treatment, adverse effects and complications, dietary restrictions, and behavioral health. [I] There is no established optimum visit length or duration between maintenance visits, but it seems reasonable to establish a minimum of quarterly follow-up (every three months) for the sustainment of weight loss and more frequently if the patient requests it. [I] Assess Adherence and Modify Treatment Adherence to weight loss programs should be assessed by periodically measuring the patient's BMI and waist circumference and providing feedback. [Expert Opinion] Patients should be encouraged to record activities by using food logs, exercise logs, and personal diaries to provide structure and allow the provider to identify compliance or relapse issues. [B] |
||||||||||||
|
STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE AND RECOMMENDATION GRADING SCHEMES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACP (2005) |
Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Levels of Evidence 1++ High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or RCTs with a very low risk of bias 1+ Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs or RCTs with a low risk of bias) 1– Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs or RCTs with a high risk of biasa 2++ High-quality systematic reviews of non-RCT, case–control, cohort, controlled before-and-after study (CBA) or interrupted time series (ITS) studies High quality non-RCT, case–control, cohort, CBA or ITS studies with a very low risk of confounding, bias or chance and a high probability that the relation is causal 2+ Well-conducted non-RCT, case–control, cohort, CBA or ITS studies with a very low risk of confounding, bias or chance and a moderate probability that the relation is causal 2– Non-RCT, case–control, cohort, CBA or ITS studies with a high risk of confounding, bias or chance and a significant risk that the relationship is not causala 3 Non-analytic studies (for example, case reports, case series) 4 Expert opinion, formal consensus a Studies with a level of evidence '–' should not be used as a basis for making a recommendation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Evidence Rating System Quality of Evidence (QE)
Overall Quality
Net Effect of the Intervention
Strength of the Recommendation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGY Click on the links below for details of guideline development methodology |
||
|---|---|---|
|
ACP METHODOLOGY |
NCCPC/NICE METHODOLOGY |
VA/DoD METHODOLOGY |
|
All three groups performed searches of electronic databases to collect the evidence; ACP and VA/DoD also performed hand-searches of published literature (both primary and secondary sources). The ACP guideline differs from the other two in that it is based on the evidence reports and accompanying background papers developed by the Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center (EPC). To assess the quality and strength of the evidence, NCCPC/NICE and VA/DoD used weighting according to a rating scheme and provide the scheme. ACP, in contrast, employed expert consensus. All three groups reviewed published meta-analyses and performed a systematic review with evidence tables to analyze the evidence. ACP also performed a meta-analysis. All three groups employed expert consensus to formulate the recommendations; NCCPC/NICE also used informal consensus. VA/DoD and NCCPC/NICE provide a description of processes used. The strength of the recommendations was graded by VA/DoD, and the scheme is provided. With regard to cost-analyses, ACP did not perform a formal cost analysis and did not review published cost analyses. NCCPC/NICE, in contrast, carried out two separate pieces of work on the cost effectiveness of interventions in clinical and public health settings (refer to section 6 of the original guideline document). In the development of its guideline, VA/DoD reviewed published cost analyses. Some variation of peer review was used as a method of guideline validation by all three groups and all three provide a description of the process. ACP also compared its guideline with USPSTF recommendations as a means to validate it. |
||
|
SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING
|
|
|---|---|
| ACP (2005) |
American College of Physicians (ACP) |
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) |
| VA/DoD (2006) |
United States Government |
|
BENEFITS AND HARMS
|
|
|---|---|
| Benefits | |
| ACP (2005) |
Appropriate pharmacologic and surgical management of obesity in primary care |
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Appropriate assessment and management of obesity in adults and children and decrease in morbidity and mortality associated with obesity |
| VA/DoD (2006) |
Weight loss improves blood pressure, cholesterol, glycemic control, and obstructive sleep apnea and reduces incident hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Modest weight loss among overweight and obese adults will reduce the incidence and severity of diabetes, a chronic condition that is linked to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. |
| Harms | |
| ACP (2005) |
Side Effects of Medications
Surgery
|
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
|
| VA/DoD (2006) |
|
|
CONTRAINDICATIONS
|
|
|---|---|
| ACP (2005) |
Not applicable |
| NCCPC/NICE (2006) |
Not applicable |
| VA/DoD (2006) |
|
ACP, American College of Physicians
BMI, body mass index
CAD, coronary artery disease
DJD, degenerative joint disease
DoD, Department of Defense
LCD, low calorie diet
MAOI, monoamine oxidase inhibitors
NCCPC/NICE, National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care/National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
NHLBI, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
RYGB, Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass
SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
USPSTF, United States Preventive Services Task Force
VHA, Veterans Health Administration
VLCD, very low calorie diet
WHO, World Health Organization
Internet citation: National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC). Guideline synthesis: Assessment and management of obesity and overweight in adults. In: National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) [website]. Rockville (MD): 2005 Apr (revised 2009 Sep) [cited YYYY Mon DD]. Available: http://www.guideline.gov.